Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Naho Sato vs Dalayna Hewitt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sato vs Hewitt analysis and find out who is favored!
Naho Sato vs Dalayna Hewitt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sato 0 - 0 Hewitt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sato has won 49.77% of points on his second serve, while Hewitt has won 49.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sato, in recent form, has won 57.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hewitt has won 49.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.97% and 35.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sato has saved 57.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hewitt has saved 57.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sato has won 60.44% of matches played (W/L 55/ 36), with Hewitt winning 50.79% (W/L 32/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sato has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 35/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hewitt has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 21/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Sato has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 50/ 36), where as Hewitt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.46% of matches (W/L 32/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sato has played against opponents with an average rank of 322.21 while Hewitt has played against players with an average rank of 245.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sato has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hewitt has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sato has converted 50.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hewitt has converted 47.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
328
Rank
328
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
428
Rank
383
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
63% (154-92)
Career Total W/L
51% (103-99)
67% (35-17)
YTD W/L
50% (13-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,835
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Naho Sato | Dalayna Hewitt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (35/17) | 50% (13/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (76/43) | 52% (30/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (587/475) | 51% (274/259) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (34/15) | 53% (9/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 35 | 161 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 139 | 114 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:4 | 1:30:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 351.48 | 312.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (2066/3312) | 57% (927/1631) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1282/2066) | 72% (669/927) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (622/1246) | 50% (351/704) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (221/437) | 48% (76/160) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1624/3444) | 40% (682/1697) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (30/17) | 52% (13/12) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (35/52) | 52% (13/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 89% (8/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (9/15) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (31/27) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (31/4) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (21/8) | 0% (10/0) |
Naho Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Hanna Chang
Player
Naho Sato
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Kyoka Okamura
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Eunhye Lee
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Naho Sato
71%
(
84 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
5
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
59 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Sarah Beth Grey
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Naho Sato
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Naho Sato
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Naho Sato
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Haruna Arakawa
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Dalayna Hewitt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
47
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
3
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
82%
(
76 of
93)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Kisa Yoshioka
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
10
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sato Vs Hewitt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
